Logo visoto
  1. Home
Page icon

SELECT ?title WHERE { ?? (rdfs:label|skos:prefLabel|schema:name) ?title . } Begründung eines Antrags

SELECT ?class WHERE { ?? (rdf:type|owl:type) ?class . } DefinedTerm, Term, Validated Entry

SELECT ?description WHERE { ?? (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . }

SELECT ?property ?value WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?value . FILTER (isLiteral(?value)) } LIMIT 1000

Attributes

Name
Begründung eines Antrags
Name
statement of reasons for a proposal
Name
développement d'une proposition
Name
motivazione di una proposta
dateModified
2017-07-31T08:23:58.4300000Z
Identifier
109234
URL
https://www.termdat.bk.admin.ch/entry/109234
citation
R Nationalrat, Art. 51 Abs. 2 (SR 171.13, Stand 2015-11)
citation
R Consiglio nazionale, art. 51 cpv. 2 (RS 171.13, stato 2015-11)
citation
National Council Standing Orders, art. 51 para. 2 (SR 171.13, transl., status 2015-11)
citation
CEATE-CN, Proposition Mo. Conseil national (CEATE-CN) (13.3372), Plan d'action national pour la santé des abeilles (CEATE), 2017-04-25 ([Internet, 2017-07-31](https://www.parlament.ch/centers/eparl/curia/2017/20170006/UREK-N01%20DF.pdf))
position
1
Linguistic Context
It shall decide without discussion on any proposal for reconsideration, after hearing a brief statement of reasons for the proposal and any counter-proposal.
Linguistic Context
Sulle proposte di rivenire su una deliberazione la Camera decide senza discussione dopo aver ascoltato una breve motivazione della proposta stessa e di un'eventuale controproposta.
Linguistic Context
Er beschliesst ohne Diskussion über einen Rückkommensantrag, nachdem er eine kurze Begründung des Antrages und eines allfälligen Gegenantrages gehört hat.
SELECT ?property ?object WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?object . FILTER (isIRI(?object)) FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000

Outgoing Relationships

property object
seeAlso proposal
inDefinedTermSet Swiss parliamentary terminology
inDefinedTermSet Swiss Federal Administration
has part Antragsbegründung
Reliability code Linguistic/formal check completed
termDomain LAW
termDomain Public law and constitutional law
termDomain POLITICS
termDomain Parliamentary work
termDomain Political parties
SELECT ?property ?subject WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?o) ?subject ?property ?o . FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000
Incoming Relationships: No results found.
SELECT ?instance ?description WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?class) ?instance (rdf:type|owl:type) ?class . OPTIONAL { ?instance schema:description ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Instances of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?superclass ?description WHERE { ?? rdfs:subClassOf ?superclass . OPTIONAL { ?superclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Superclasses of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?subclass ?description WHERE { ?subclass rdfs:subClassOf ?? . OPTIONAL { ?subclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Subclasses of this Class: No results found.