Logo visoto
  1. Home
Page icon

SELECT ?title WHERE { ?? (rdfs:label|skos:prefLabel|schema:name) ?title . } case law of the supreme court

SELECT ?class WHERE { ?? (rdf:type|owl:type) ?class . } DefinedTerm, Term, Validated Entry

SELECT ?description WHERE { ?? (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . }

SELECT ?property ?value WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?value . FILTER (isLiteral(?value)) } LIMIT 1000

Attributes

Name
case law of the supreme court
Name
höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung
Name
jurisprudence de la plus haute instance juridique
Name
giurisprudenza di ultima istanza
dateModified
2025-11-17T10:01:24.8758240Z
Identifier
520932
URL
https://www.termdat.bk.admin.ch/entry/520932
citation
FCh, Terminology Section, 2025
citation
fedpol, Car postal: Emanuel Lauber est le nouveau responsable d'enquête, 2021-08-26 ([Internet, 2025-08-18](https://www.bj.admin.ch/fedpol/fr/home/aktuell/informationen/2021-08-26.html))
citation
fedpol, PostAuto: Emanuel Lauber ist der neue Verfahrensleiter, 2021-08-26 ([Internet, 2025-08-18](https://www.bj.admin.ch/fedpol/de/home/aktuell/informationen/2021-08-26.html))
citation
G. Gaeta, Il termine di decadenza previsto dall'art. 29, d.lgs. n. 276/2003 si applica anche all'INPS, in: Massimario di giurisprudenza del lavoro, 2021-1 ([Internet, 2025-09-15](https://www.massimariogiurisprudenzadellavoro.it/Article/Archive/index_html?ida=182&idn=16&idi=-1&idu=-1))
position
1
Linguistic Context
Nach eingehender Analyse des Entscheids des Berner Obergerichts hat fedpol entschieden, Beschwerde beim Bundesgericht einzureichen und damit eine höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung zur Frage des Einsatzes einer Verfahrensleitung durch eine Bundesbehörde in einem Verwaltungsstrafverfahren zu erhalten.
Linguistic Context
Suite à l'analyse détaillée de la décision de la Cour suprême bernoise, fedpol a fait recours [...] auprès du Tribunal fédéral afin d'apporter une jurisprudence de la plus haute instance juridique au sujet de l'engagement d'un responsable d'enquête.
Linguistic Context
[N]el nostro assetto costituzionale la funzione nomofilattica assegnata alla giurisprudenza di ultima istanza è unicamente quella di “custodire la legge” e non certo di “innovare” la stessa.
Term Note
EXP: p. ex. en Suisse la jurisprudence du Tribunal fédéral, en France et en Belgique celle de la Cour de cassation
Term Note
EXP: z. B. in der Schweiz die Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichts, in Deutschland des Bundesgerichtshofs, Bundesarbeitsgerichts, Bundesverwaltungsgerichts, Bundessozialgerichts bzw. Bundesfinanzhofs, in Österreich des Obersten Gerichtshofs, Verwaltungsgerichtshofs bzw. Verfassungsgerichtshofs
Term Note
USG: suggestion; EXP: e.g. the case law of the Federal Supreme Court (in Switzerland), the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom or the Supreme Court of the United States
Term Note
EXP: p. es. in Svizzera la giurisprudenza emanata dal Tribunale federale, in Italia quella emanata dalla Corte di cassazione
termNoteCitation
FCh, Terminology Section, 2025
termNoteCitation
CaF, Sezione di terminologia, 2025
termNoteCitation
BK, Sektion Terminologie, 2025
termNoteCitation
ChF, Section de terminologie, 2025
SELECT ?property ?object WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?object . FILTER (isIRI(?object)) FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000

Outgoing Relationships

property object
seeAlso case law of the Federal Supreme Court
inDefinedTermSet Legal Terminology
inDefinedTermSet Swiss Federal Administration
has part case law of the highest court
has part giurisprudenza di massima istanza
hypernym case law
Reliability code Provisional
termDomain LAW
termDomain Authorities, institutions, organisations and companies
termDomain Procedural law
SELECT ?property ?subject WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?o) ?subject ?property ?o . FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000

Incoming Relationships

property subject
seeAlso case law of the Federal Supreme Court
SELECT ?instance ?description WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?class) ?instance (rdf:type|owl:type) ?class . OPTIONAL { ?instance schema:description ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Instances of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?superclass ?description WHERE { ?? rdfs:subClassOf ?superclass . OPTIONAL { ?superclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Superclasses of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?subclass ?description WHERE { ?subclass rdfs:subClassOf ?? . OPTIONAL { ?subclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Subclasses of this Class: No results found.