Logo visoto
  1. Home
Page icon

SELECT ?title WHERE { ?? (rdfs:label|skos:prefLabel|schema:name) ?title . } doppelrelevante Tatsache

SELECT ?class WHERE { ?? (rdf:type|owl:type) ?class . } DefinedTerm, Term, Validated Entry

SELECT ?description WHERE { ?? (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . }

SELECT ?property ?value WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?value . FILTER (isLiteral(?value)) } LIMIT 1000

Attributes

Name
doppelrelevante Tatsache
Name
fait de double pertinence
Name
fatto con doppia rilevanza
dateModified
2023-03-08T17:57:18.5788960Z
Identifier
481292
URL
https://www.termdat.bk.admin.ch/entry/481292
citation
Bundesgerichtsentscheide, 137 III 32 (2010)
citation
Arrêts du Tribunal fédéral, 137 III 32 (2010)
citation
Decisione del Tribunale federale, 4A_11/2019, 2019-03-12, consid. 3.2 ([Internet, 2021-04-03](https://www.bger.ch/ext/eurospider/live/de/php/aza/http/index.php?highlight_docid=aza%3A%2F%2F12-03-2019-4A_11-2019&lang=de&type=show_document&zoom=YES&))
position
1
Linguistic Context
Demgegenüber seien Tatsachen doppelrelevant, wenn die für die Zuständigkeit des Gerichts massgebenden Tatsachen ebenfalls für die Begründetheit der Klage massgebend seien.
Linguistic Context
Giova innanzi tutto premettere che la pretesa esistenza di un contratto di locazione costituisce un cosiddetto fatto con doppia rilevanza e cioè un fatto determinante sia per stabilire la competenza del tribunale sia per giudicare la fondatezza dell'azione.
Linguistic Context
Les faits sont doublement pertinents ou de double pertinence (doppelrelevante Tatsachen) lorsque les faits déterminants pour la compétence du tribunal sont également ceux qui sont déterminants pour le bien-fondé de l’action.
Term Note
USG: privilégié
Term Note
USG: Vorzugsbenennung; EXP: vor Gericht vorgebrachte Tatsache, die für die Zuständigkeit des angerufenen Gerichts als auch die Begründetheit der Klage erheblich ist
termNoteCitation
nach Bundesgerichtsentscheide, 137 III 32 (2010)
SELECT ?property ?object WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?object . FILTER (isIRI(?object)) FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000

Outgoing Relationships

property object
inDefinedTermSet Terminology of Swiss civil procedure
inDefinedTermSet Swiss Federal Administration
has part Theorie der doppelrelevanten Tatsachen
has part théorie des faits de double pertinence
has part teoria dei fatti con doppia rilevanza
has part théorie de la double pertinence
has part teoria della doppia rilevanza
Reliability code Linguistic/formal check completed
termDomain LAW
termDomain Procedural law
SELECT ?property ?subject WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?o) ?subject ?property ?o . FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000
Incoming Relationships: No results found.
SELECT ?instance ?description WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?class) ?instance (rdf:type|owl:type) ?class . OPTIONAL { ?instance schema:description ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Instances of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?superclass ?description WHERE { ?? rdfs:subClassOf ?superclass . OPTIONAL { ?superclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Superclasses of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?subclass ?description WHERE { ?subclass rdfs:subClassOf ?? . OPTIONAL { ?subclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Subclasses of this Class: No results found.