SELECT ?property ?value WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?value . FILTER (isLiteral(?value)) } LIMIT 1000

Attributes

subsidiarité
Subsidiarität
sussidiarietà
subsidiarity
Umstand, dass von zwei verwandten Tatbeständen der subsidiäre nach dem Sinn des Gesetzes nur dann zur Anwendung gelangt, wenn nicht alle Voraussetzungen des anderen gegeben sind.
Situation in which, where there are two related crimes, the lesser in terms of the law only applies if not all the requirements of the other are fulfilled.
Rapport existant entre deux dispositions pénales qui règlent le même comportement punissable mais dont l'une est applicable uniquement si l'autre ne l'est pas.
2025-07-29T12:30:35.9814100Z
108280
https://www.termdat.bk.admin.ch/entry/108280
([UN, ICTR, Trial Chamber III, Judgement Kupreskic, Part V, Applicable Law, no. 665, Internet (2015-04-16)](http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kupreskic/tjug/en/kup-tj000114e-5.htm))
Decisioni del Tribunale federale, 121 IV 29 (1995)
A. Donatsch / B. Tag, Strafrecht I, 2006, § 38 Ziff. 3.23, S. 401
P. Graven / B. Sträuli, L'infraction pénale punissable, 1995, p. 338
EXP: a crime will only be prosecuted if there is not another more serious crime which could be prosecuted
EXP: principe applicable en cas de concours apparent (a); p. ex. la filouterie d'auberge (art. 149 CP) est subsidiaire par rapport à l'escroquerie (art. 146 CP) (b)
USG: üblich; EXP: Anwendungsfall der unechten Idealkonkurrenz; z. B. ist die Zechprellerei (Art. 149 StGB) subsidiär zum Betrug (Art. 146 StGB)
(a) d'après J. Hurtado Pozo, Droit pénal, Partie générale, 2008, chap. 21, § 5 tit. avant N. 1481, p. 474; (b) d'après J. Hurtado Pozo, Droit pénal, Partie générale, 2008, chap. 21, § 5 N. 1495, p. 478
(EXP) after A. Donatsch / B. Tag, Strafrecht I, 2006, Anhang, p. 442
(EXP) nach A. Donatsch / B. Tag, Strafrecht I, 2006, § 38 Ziff. 3.23, S. 401
after A. Donatsch / B. Tag, Strafrecht I, 2006, § 38 Ziff. 3.23, p. 401
d'après J. Hurtado Pozo, Droit pénal, Partie générale, 2008, chap. 21, § 5 N. 1494, p. 477
nach A. Donatsch / B. Tag, Strafrecht I, 2006, § 38 Ziff. 3.23, S. 401
SELECT ?property ?object WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?s) ?s ?property ?object . FILTER (isIRI(?object)) FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000
SELECT ?property ?subject WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?o) ?subject ?property ?o . FILTER (?property != rdf:type) FILTER (?property != rdfs:subClassOf) } LIMIT 1000

Incoming Relationships

property subject
seeAlso ideal concurrence
hypernym formal subsidiarity
hypernym material subsidiarity
SELECT ?instance ?description WHERE { BIND (?? AS ?class) ?instance (rdf:type|owl:type) ?class . OPTIONAL { ?instance schema:description ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Instances of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?superclass ?description WHERE { ?? rdfs:subClassOf ?superclass . OPTIONAL { ?superclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Superclasses of this Class: No results found.
SELECT ?subclass ?description WHERE { ?subclass rdfs:subClassOf ?? . OPTIONAL { ?subclass (rdfs:comment|schema:description) ?description . } } LIMIT 5000
Subclasses of this Class: No results found.